Skip to content
Don MacLeod
Don MacLeod

22,000+ Wake-Ups Into This Lifetime

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Marketing
  • About
    • Notable Don MacLeod’s
    • Portfolio
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    • Copyright Notice
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Earnings Disclaimer
    • FTC Compliance
    • Medical Disclaimer
Don MacLeod

22,000+ Wake-Ups Into This Lifetime

Doomsday Clock 2026: Closer to Catastrophe, Further From Solutions

Posted on January 29, 2026January 29, 2026 By Don MacLeod

The Doomsday Clock 2026 announcement landed this week with all the fanfare of a fire alarm in an empty building. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the clock four seconds closer to midnight. We’re now at 85 seconds — the closest humanity has ever been to self-inflicted annihilation since they started this grim tradition in 1947.

Not because some asteroid showed up unannounced. Because we keep making spectacularly bad decisions and calling it “strategy.”

A Worldwide Failure of Leadership
The Bulletin didn’t mince words. They called it a “failure of leadership,” which is the academic equivalent of saying the house is on fire and the homeowners are debating paint colors.

Alexandra Bell, president and CEO of the Bulletin, laid it out: “Catastrophic risks are on the rise, cooperation is on the decline, and we are running out of time.”

The statement specifically named the United States, Russia, and China as the countries whose leaders need to pull their heads out of the sand. These are the nations with nuclear arsenals, geopolitical leverage, and apparently zero interest in using them responsibly.

What Moved the Clock This Time?
The usual suspects — nuclear brinkmanship, climate collapse, AI running loose without guardrails, and biosecurity risks that make pandemic preparedness look quaint. But the real kicker this year? The rise of nationalistic autocracies and the collapse of international cooperation.

“A world splintering into ‘us versus them’ will leave all of humanity more vulnerable,” said Daniel Holz, chair of the Science and Security Board.

Translation: We’re all on the same lifeboat, but half the passengers are drilling holes in the hull to prove a point.

Nuclear Risk: Arms Control in Tatters
Russia and the United States — the two countries with enough warheads to end civilization before lunch — have let arms control treaties collapse like wet cardboard. Active conflicts now involve nuclear powers. Missile defense systems are getting upgraded. The moratorium on explosive nuclear testing is hanging by a thread.

Meanwhile, China is expanding its arsenal, and nobody’s talking about limits because talking requires trust, and trust requires leaders who see beyond the next election cycle.

Climate Change: Fossil Fuels Forever, Apparently
The planet is warming at a pace that would alarm anyone paying attention. Congress, however, has decided renewable energy is the enemy — a war on windmills and solar panels while oil executives nod approvingly from the sidelines.

The Bulletin suggested Congress could “repudiate President Donald Trump’s war on renewable energy” and instead provide incentives to accelerate the reduction of fossil fuels.

Bold suggestion. Also: not happening.

AI and Biosecurity: The Unregulated Frontier
Artificial intelligence is being woven into military systems — including nuclear command and control — without meaningful guidelines. The prospect of AI-generated biological threats sits in the “feasible but terrifying” category, right next to mirror life creation, which sounds like science fiction but isn’t.

The international community could regulate this. Multilateral agreements. National safeguards. Basic common sense.

Instead, we’re sprinting toward the cliff and arguing about who gets to jump first.

The Clock Isn’t a Prediction — It’s a Warning
The Doomsday Clock doesn’t forecast the apocalypse. It’s not Nostradamus with a metronome. It’s a symbolic assessment by scientists who’ve spent their careers studying existential risk — people who helped build the first atomic bombs and have been regretting it ever since.

Each year, the Science and Security Board asks two questions:

  • Is humanity safer or at greater risk this year than last year?
  • Is humanity safer or at greater risk than it was 79 years ago, when the clock was set?
  • Their answers set the time. This year, the answers were grim.

What Could Actually Help?
Even at 85 seconds to midnight, the Bulletin insists we’re not doomed — just dangerously close. They offered a list of actions that could pull us back:

  • Resume nuclear dialogue. The US and Russia could discuss limiting their arsenals. All nuclear-armed states could avoid destabilizing missile defense investments and honor the testing moratorium.
  • Regulate AI and biosecurity. Multilateral agreements to prevent AI-generated biological threats. Guidelines for AI in military systems.
  • Invest in renewable energy. Congress could stop sabotaging clean energy and start incentivizing rapid fossil fuel reduction.
  • International cooperation. The US, Russia, and China could engage in bilateral and multilateral dialogue on AI, nuclear systems, and climate.

Reasonable suggestions. Politically improbable.

The Message Is Clear — The Response Isn’t
“The Doomsday Clock’s message cannot be clearer,” Bell said. “Change is both necessary and possible, but the global community must demand swift action from its leaders.”

There it is — the gap between what needs to happen and what’s actually happening. The scientists have done their job. They’ve measured the risk, sounded the alarm, and pointed to the exits.

The leaders with the power to act? They’re still debating whether the alarm is even real.

85 seconds to midnight. The clock’s ticking. The question is whether anyone with actual authority will bother to listen before the alarm stops being metaphorical…

Culture Politics Science apocalypse metaphorartificial intelligence threatsBulletin of Atomic Scientistsclimate changeclimate crisisDoomsday Clock 2026end times symbolismexistential riskgeopolitical tensionglobal leadership failuremisinformationnuclear riskUS-Russia relations

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Search

Recent Posts

  • Six More Weeks of Winter: The Groundhog Has Spoken (And We’re Not Okay)
  • Food Companies Discovered Protein Sells — So Now Everything Has It
  • The Snow Globe Effect: When Winter Stops Being Charming
  • Six Years of Receipts — And The Groceries Aren’t Getting Cheaper
  • Doomsday Clock 2026: Closer to Catastrophe, Further From Solutions
  • Area 51’s “Dorito” Aircraft Reappears With Military Code About Beer and Cheese
  • The AI CEO Who Actually Read the Room — And It’s On Fire
  • Two Dead, Three Weeks. The Civil War Simulation Didn’t Account for Body Count
  • Winter Storm Fatigue Meets News Fatigue — And Now We’re All Just Tired
  • The Coast Guard Did Its Job Perfectly — Rescuing Someone From a Completely Avoidable Situation
©2026 Don MacLeod | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes